Several months ago I wrote a post explaining that I didn’t want to be an Interaction Designer forever (you can read Confession: I don’t want to be an Interaction Designer forever here). I’ve been doing even more reading, thinking, discussing on the topic, and have come up with additional thoughts and issues for us, as a UX community, to think about. What I’m going to write about today is the fact that one of the main issues that we see, but at times ignore, in this field is that most of us try to be jacks of all trades within UX. We try to be, and at times are successful at being, the IA and the IxD and the Content Strategist and the Visual Designer. Now you may be thinking, ‘duh Lis, that is how this field works’. But I would argue that this is an issue, a big issue, for several reasons.
First, by UXers trying to accomplish the entire suite of UX work themselves, we deter UX from maturing as a profession. What do I mean by this? I mean that if we continue to do this, UX as a profession, especially in organizations, cannot grow. Since one person, or several people, can handle a large amount of variation in their work, there is no reason to learn about and understand, as an outsider of UX, the different parts of the field. Why would I need to learn what content strategy is vs. interaction design vs. research when you do it all? Further more why would I budget for those activities when I’m not sure what they are and their benefit, and why would I hire someone for a specific role, even if we need an in house researcher, if I have no reason to believe that you can’t handle it all. Remember, UX is all about the Benjamins right?
Second, by us being jacks of all trades it can stump our own individual growth. How many of you out there know what your career path is? Ok you can do wireframes, interviews, task analysis, etc… but what next? UX management? But you don’t want to be a manager. What else besides management is next for a UXer? We can’t answer that question, because there are not career paths that have been established in our field. This is because the roles we play are so spread out and generalized that it is almost impossible to focus on one track… in fact there isn’t only one track. This leaves it up to the individual to determine how they want to grow, and who has the time to do that when there are specs to write?
Last, having one person cover all the roles in UX stops an individual from being truly satisfied and happy as a professional. There are so many things for us to do in this field. Some of which we enjoy doing (I love research, discovery, strategy, etc yay!) and some of which we don’t (I tend not to enjoy specing, wireframing, etc… boo!). Because of the issues I’ve mentioned above, though, companies aren’t going to hire different people for both roles, because I can do it all! (there are other reasons too I’m sure, I’m just focusing on this discussion). Therefore, I’m constantly having to do work I don’t enjoy in order to get the work I do enjoy. This leaves me, at times, with a feeling of dissatisfaction. By focusing in on the things I want to do, and by having a mature profession that allows me to do that, I can find more individual professional happiness.
Ok, so I’ve exposed the elephant in the room (yes I think that an IA is different than an IxD) and I’ve explained why I think we have an issue. So what do I propose we do about it? First, I think we need to try to stop being jacks of all trade. I saw this great article on Freelance Switch about 5 mistakes that will end your career. Take a look at #3. Being a jack of all trades makes us mediocre instead of awesome. If we stop allowing ourselves to be a do it all shop, people and companies will be forced to hire different people for different roles. Then, you can concentrate and focus on the UX stuff that you like, as opposed to having to do it all.
Second, we need to support and advocate for this different roles. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard UXers scoff at the term content strategy (isn’t that just IA??). Well there was a gig where I got to work with a truly gifted content strategist, and it was the best thing ever! They did all the work that I hated doing, and frankly the work that I wasn’t very good at. This made our solution ten times better than it would have been, and I was ten times more satisfied with my work. Advocate for a split in roles instead of being scared you’re going to lose your job… if you’re good, you won’t.
Lastly, I think we need to be more active in and provide more assistance to our education system. We have some phenomenal programs out there today that teach UX. But, they can be even better with our input and suggestions. Talk to the people that are part of these programs and share your ideas and thoughts about the work in this community. By doing so, they can continue to improve the course work that students receive and better prepare people for the UX working world. Thus, new UXers will already come in not expecting to be do-it-all shops and we can stop the bleeding at the core.
Thus, what do I see as the implication to the UX future if we are able to turn this ship? I think that UX will mature as a profession. We’ll start to see career paths and companies/organizations will better understand what we do, as well as their high need for our skills. You, as an individual, will also start to be more satisfied with you work. Not having to do the sitemap (but being involved in it) when you hate doing sitemaps will allow you to concentrate on how the user interacts through the site, the stuff you like to do. And finally UX will start to be respected as a field, and will not be seen as a bunch of people that have no idea what to call themselves. It’s time that we started to grow up and see that we are no longer advocating just for our users’ sake, but we are advocating for our place in the professional realm. We cannot do that until we know what to call ourselves and we won’t know what to call ourselves until we better define who we are and what we do as individuals in UX.
[…] UX… It’s Time to Grow Up | Lis HubertJack of all trades, master of none […]
hi Lis, thanks for the interesting post! nnIt seems pretty fluid, or maybe cyclic, to me…for the past 3 or so years “kitchen sink” positions have indeed proliferated, but prior to that, there was more differentiation among job roles (was that when there was more money? before management were certain they knew what was required to “get design done” and reduced positions from 3 to 1? before a flood of new folks started pouring into the market hungry for whatever gigs they could get, thirsty to learn all? not sure). But maybe it’s a pendulum swing, and we’re simply in a generalist phase .nnbtw, I agree with you that IA isn’t IxD. I’m a pretty multifaceted IA but on the spectrum that IxD sometimes claims from coding/building to visual design and everything in between, I expertly cover some of that in between waterfront, as well as research (which sometimes is/sometimes isn’t baked into IxD). So, all that to say: (1) I have been able to find specialist jobs–and I still see them in the market tho there are indeed more amalgamy jobs; and (2) it may be cyclic–there are tangible benefits/drawbacks to the jack of all trades paradigm, as well as to specialization. It also is a drag when you’re in a situation where the researchers are on another floor and visual designers have wireframes tossed to them over the wall, and coders are in their own little world.
You’re very welcome… thank you for reading! You bring up some really great points to think about indeed.
“We have some phenomenal programs out there today that teach UX.”nJust curious as someone who thinks about moving into UX: What programs are you thinking about there?
The 2 that come to mind are SVA in NYC http://www.schoolofvisualarts.edu/index.jsp and SCAD down in Savannah: http://www.scad.edu/. I know that this has been talked about a lot on the ixda.org discussion boards as well, so you might want to look there for suggestions. I know there are many other programs that the ones I mentioned, but those are the first that spring to mind.
[…] Jacks of all trades and how, unless they want to go into management, this is career limiting (see UX… It’s Time to Grow Up). Among many cogent points, she wrote: …by us being jacks of all trades it can stump our own […]
For a future career path, why not consider a senior position in Marketing or Product Development? In a way, you have to anticipate your user or customer’s needs. Would seem to translate well from UX.
It might have been Jared Spool who drew a comparison of UX roles to film production roles. For a small documentary in Nashville, maybe there’s a 3-person crew of generalists. On a giant Hollywood production, it’s a giant list of people, titles of which you and I probably don’t understand, but the people that hire them know what they do. Maybe we’ll end up like that.
I remember that comparison…. I’m so glad you brought it up. Maybe we will all end up like that afterall
I agree with you on the need for more specialization, and the ensuing benefits and longevity it lends to the discipline. nnWith that said, there are some market dynamics that drive this. As technology markets mature, the need and ability for more specific levels of specialization start to appear. In a market like London or New York, where there are higher dollar technology projects with project managers who understand the breadth of the UX field, I think this specialization is excellent, and should be encouraged. As you said – it only makes the work and the field better. nnWhere things break down are in the less mature markets. In a place like Nashville, where I live, UX is an almost nonexistent field. I’m one of two independent UX professionals that I know in town, and that scarcity is there for a reason. The companies spending money on technology here don’t understand – and thus, don’t invest in – user experience work. In a market like that, specialization can hurt the overall adoption of UX within that market, as companies can’t afford, or don’t understand the need to pay for, specialized sub-UX skills. In that scenario, a more broad-brushed approach to UX is often necessary to get hired, and to prove the value of user experience in general.nnAs we see these nascent technology markets mature, I think that we’ll see an increasing level of specialization, which I think will only help to make the discipline better.
This is a great point and one I failed to think about… thank you so much for sharing this… it adds a whole new, and very valid, dimension!
Absolutely, exactly what I was thinking.
I’m in Fresno, CA – located in Central California – mostly considered “farm country”. UX is definitely an afterthought. Companies here are still needing to be sold on the idea that a “website” is crucial to their success! Its amazing to me how far behind we are here when it comes to the latest trends in web disciplines, marketing and technology.
I want to learn more about UX (wanting to leave the Fresno market to the more progressive and up-to-date market of the bay area, or San Francisco area), which is the reason I’m on this site. I do nice design and have done so for almost 10 years now in the Fresno market but am concerned now that these new trends have passed me by, forcing me to come to blogs like this in search for more info.
Had an interview today with a company from SF that liked my work, and then he asked me the question… “Do you have examples of UX work?” Honestly, I didn’t even understand the question – I never heard of the term or thought it would apply to me. I guess I do now. I’m thinking, well I’m to blame for not having found the correct and specific definition of the term as of yet, or the Fresno market, for keeping me stuck – still educating companies about the need to get email accounts or twitter pages in 2011! Really?
Point, search available UX or UI positions in Fresno – you’ll be lucky to find ONE! Do the same search for San Francisco and you’ll find hundreds of positions available in the 6 figure range.
Amen sister! Completely agree!
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Sandoval. Chris Sandoval said: RT @lishubert: New Blog Post: UX… It's Time to Grow Up http://bit.ly/hDSOXR […]